An insane linguistic omelette – and other miseries of the modern world


It is the privilege and one of the few pleasures of the old and useless – ie, people like me – to have a good moan, so here goes.

This morning I saw four things that irritate me currently combined in one phrase. These things are: stupid slogans, jargon, social networks and the current worship of cooks.

What touched it all off was an invitation from someone to add them to my list of friends on Facebook.

I only belong to this because someone asked me, and I was taught never to be rude, so I complied. Ever since I have been embarrassed and irriteted becaase I keep getting more invitations, some of which for some mysterious reason I can accept and others of which I can’t.

In the latter case I go to my page and a message says ”This invitation is not intended for you”. Which makes me wonder how the hell I got it. How many drayton@draytonbird.coms are there?

It happened again this morning. Then I saw a message saying Richard Hill had “poked” me. Now the word poke has a certain meaning to us here in England, and I can only say a) that my tastes are heterosexual and b) as sexual experiences go, Richard, this was unsatisfactory, especially as c) when I tried to reciprocate I got a message saying I couldn’t. Just as well, Richard. It would have ben an ugly sight.

My irritation was not lessened when I saw an ad on my page reading Empowering chefs globally followed by Chefsworld A world created by chefs for chefs, and the explanation Chefsworld is the largest independant resource available for chefs.

This opening impelled me, as a collector of linguistic debris, to click through. I got the following tasteless verbal bouillabaisse:

Welcome to our world, A world created by chefs for chefs. The purpose of ChefsWorlds is to empower chefs in the marketplace by opening up communication channels between chefs globally. Membership is free and gives you access to all facilities listed below. ChefsWorld™ is not a recruitment site, but we do provide this facility.

“The aim of ChefsWorld is to empower chefs in the Global Market. ChefsWorld is an independent Resource for Chefs, free from magazine, association and PR influence. So Welcome to your World, a World created by Chefs for Chefs.”

Set aside the fact that the twat who wrote this can’t spell independent, keeps repeating him or herself and capitalising the “w” in world for no reason, and that the ONLY purpose of this site is to make money through recruitment advertising, and I would like to say the following.

1. Anybody using the word “empowering” should be burnt to death. This nasty word should be locked up where it belongs – in politics and corporate masturbation, with other linguistic garbage like “strategic”, “proactive”, “ongoing” and “initiative.

2. Chefs have far too much power already. They are just cooks, for God’s sake, Get them off television. Put them back in the kitchen where they belong, on a sensible wage. Then UK restaurant prices might come down to sane levels. If we had all our evening meals in a London restaurant that cooks as well as my two flat-sharers we would be paying £80 a night.

3. Chefs are welcome to their world, which would be full of bad-tempered, drunken, ill-mannered, rapacious egomaniacs. A bloody nightmare.

4. Gordon Ramsay is a foul-mouthed if quick-witted oaf who should be locked up for six months in a small room with Alan Sugar and a selection of Big Brother contestants. The only restaurants of his I have been in were absurdly overpriced for what they provided.

5. I don’t want ads of any kind on what is supposed to be a place to meet people. Piss off, illiterates who want to make money out of unemployable chefs – or anyone else. Leave us to our mutual poking.

Next week: A new government strategic initiative led by Hazel Blears and Ed Balls: Empowering transgendered sewage workers proactively.

NOTE FOR NON-ENGLISH READERS: Ed Balls is not a joke name I made up. The UK is in deep economic shit. Largely responsible is this man Balls who was economic adviser and surrogate brain to Mr. Gordon Brown. Mr. Balls is now the Minister for Children, Schools and Families.

When I was young we had parents and children who made up families. The parents sent their children to school. Now we have ministers.

Mr. Balls’ economic wisdom helped create a tax system which actively discriminates against marriage. This does not help, and has led to soaring rates of delinquency, lower educational standards which have been concealed by rigging the examination results and criteria.

Having fucked up the country, Mr Balls’ new job is to fuck up what he has not yet got round to fucking up. He has never had a proper job, but I have every confidence in him.

Hazel Blears is a bit of a joke, but very nice apparently. She started out as a lawyer before giving up work. She used to be in charge of crime reduction.

Crime has risen inexorably in this country and will continue to do so because of Mr. Balls and his like.

Now she is Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. Not a worry. They are already in such a mess that she can’t do too much harm there

About the Author

In 2003, the Chartered Institute of Marketing named Drayton one of 50 living individuals who have shaped today’s marketing.

He has worked in 55 countries with many of the world’s greatest brands. These include American Express, Audi, Bentley, British Airways, Cisco, Columbia Business School, Deutsche Post, Ford, IBM, McKinsey, Mercedes, Microsoft, Nestle, Philips, Procter & Gamble, Toyota, Unilever, Visa and Volkswagen.

Drayton has helped sell everything from Airbus planes to Peppa Pig. His book, Commonsense Direct and Digital Marketing, out in 17 languages, has been the UK’s best seller on the subject every year since 1982. He has also run his own businesses in the U.K., Portugal and Malaysia.

He was a main board member of the Ogilvy Group, a founding member of the Superbrands Organisation, one of the first eight Honorary Fellows of the Institute of Direct Marketing and one of the first three people named to the Hall of Fame of the Direct Marketing Association of India. He has also been given Lifetime Achievement Awards by the Caples Organisation in New York and Early To Rise in Florida.

4 Comments

  1. Mr. Bird,

    I have to admit that, even as a tech-oriented person, I find these social networking sites rather pointless. Or, I should say, I haven’t seen any profitability off of them, and, frankly, I’d rather email the people I know or post comments on their blogs than mess around with facebook, etc.

    So, having said all that, I agree with your conclusions there. (I don’t even think David Ogilvy, chef as he was, would have cared one whit for Chefsworld, but you would know that better than I.) Maybe with such verbosity I should be a politician.

    As to Mr. Balls screwing up (pun intended) the education system, you might like to go over to amazon and look into some of John Taylor Gatto’s books on education (see: http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_ss_w_h_/202-1187481-3759817?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=John+Taylor+Gatto&x=0&y=0). His work references the U.S. educational system, but I’m sure that what put the U.S. institutional school system into place was probably the same forces that put the U.K. school system into place, too. I especially recommend his Underground History of American Education.

    And, since I’ve recommended things you haven’t asked for recommendations on, I’ll stop taking up your time and go enjoy my Sunday now.

    Cheers!

    – John

  2. Right on the money again, Drayton!

    Facebook seems utterly pointless. I have an entry there and apart from my daughter nobody has wanted to be my friend or even poke me, so in a rush of initiative I am going to be proactive and in my ongoing strategic planning negatively install my entry.

    Incidentally, ever looked up ‘strategic’ in the dictionary? Its proper use seems confined to matters military.

    As for celebrity chefs – well where I live we don’t have the opportunity to eat at their restaurants so we save enormous amounts of money. We even have to cook at home. Though I must say that I like Jamie Oliver, he at least made cooking seem like fun.
    Cheers
    John

  3. Nice article Drayton.

    I think that beyond scanning a quick update of what your friends have been up to, and viewing people’s photos online without the 2-hour holiday snap tour de force of yesteryear, Facebook IS pretty useless.

    Unless you happen to be Blockbuster or the CIA, but that’s another long and complicated story.

    Celebratory chef worship. I hate it.

    I had the misfortune to see an article in an in-flight magazine recently on such an individual, complete with the obligatory sexy photo of him outside his over-priced establishment, chest and groin thrusting out like a desperate adolescent on a Saturday night who needs some attention.

    In a sane world, people would remember that such people were ridiculed at school for being girls and sissies!

    Okay, maybe I’ve gone too far.

    Regards,
    Richard.

  4. Hello Drayton,

    That copy from the Chefsworld site was probably written for search engines, not for human beings – that’s why it’s so annoying to read (apart from the obviously irritating subject matter, of course).

    You’re right though – “celebrity” chefs – meh, who needs them? My nan used to make the best Yorkshire puds ever, but nobody ever saw fit to put her on the telly. And she was a million times more entertaining than Ramsay, Oliver et al (probably swore more too, now I come to think of it).

    Debs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *