A few people take the trouble to write to me and comment or suggest things, which I do appreciate.
Today my main challenge is to make a chili to poison the guests at my son Phil and his wife Megan’s annual Christmas bash, but Robert Currey wrote to me about a (very good) blog by photographer Trey Ratcliff and asked what I thought.
Trey decided to measure the performance of his advertising in magazines – a blindingly obvious idea ignored by the fools in big firms who think marketing means just spraying money around at random with no regard to the results.
He concluded that print is now a waste of time. and we should throw everything on-line. Robert asked me if I agree. Here are some thoughts for you.
1. In the days back when I compared the ROI on advertising in trade mags with direct mail a couple of times. Direct mail did four times better. One reason, I think, is that most trade mags are tripe.
2. However, most advertising in mags is as bad as the editorial, so good ads work, as they shine out like good deeds in a naughty world.
3. Most people who use the internet haven’t a clue and can’t be bothered to study. It is NOT easy to understand. The water is muddied by thieving rogues who tell you all you need is either a) traffic b) good traffic c) be at the top of the Google rankings d) “my secret super launch formula” – that’s made me a fortune out of mugs like you.
4. You must attract the right people – thousands of them; you must get them to give their details; you must follow them up with an endless series of messages – on auto-responder and otherwise – that are interesting, relevant and helpful enough to make them buy eventually. You must use all available channels (this one for example). A whole lot easier said than done when so few people can think clearly, write well, or even take the trouble to bloody count.
The chortle was the second of the day as far as he’s concerned. He’s written an autobiography that’s promoted in posters as the man who tells it to you straight. What a comedian.
I don’t know who is worse – him with all the crooked cronies he had around him – or Boris Johnson who in his first two years pissed away £9 million on “consultants”. But I do know that every time I read the words “vow” or “pledge” a lie is not far behind.
Hi, thanks for analysing the question. I did notice that in the video Trey's ad barely has a tweet's worth of information.
He might have done better if the advert contained more of the compelling stories from his blog. The magazine medium seems to have pushed him into watering down what Trey has to say to a slight and boring message. Presumably because we think magazine advertising is supposed to look like that.
It was damning that he got little attention and service from the people selling him the space in the mags.
I had fun reading your post. I have found more interesting facts about this and I think that I can use this as as one of my marketing tools. I am using online video marketing as an effective tool, and I have found a website as well in which I can share with you. http://www.mojovideomarketing.com/. Thanks.
11 December 2011 18:25It is extraordinary that people who themselves feel strongly, believe in and think deeply about what they sell have little or no faith in it – to the point that they say very little about it in print.There is also a rather odd assumption that people reading magazines leave their attention spans behind. In the 1980's McGraw-Hill analysed the readership of their Business Week ads. Those with more than 1,000 words got substantially higher readership than those with less.That is interesting; but not as interesting as the fact that as they were longer they could make a fuller sales argument – and thus get more sales.I could go on – but on the matter of people who sell space, they tend to be no more sensible than the people they sell to. Fools of a feather flock together.
hi Drayton – this microphone (the audio technica AT2020) is great – I have one and the sound quality is superb. plugs into a PC via USB – on Amazon here: http://goo.gl/W3G0D
I got one in New York which I hope/believe will work – if I (or rather Chloe) can learn how to work it:-)
Michael is utterly right.
1. Anyone who blithely spends money like that without testing and analysing the responses has more money than sense.
2. As Hopkins pointed out nigh on 80 years ago, there is only one answer to every advertising question: conduct a test.
3 The things that matter most in marketing are, in order: a) Product and positioning; b) Research and testing c) Targeting d) Incentive d) creative.
I have not looked closely at what this gentleman did but I gather he ignored b) and d) since I am told the copy was very brief. Whether he offered an incentive I don't know